On the Technical vs. Public Accessibility of Historical Web Content as Patent Prior Art

Published by on

"Solar-powered sun flower seen in Provence, France, near Avignon" by Ralf Steinberger under CC BY 2.0
A recent blog post by John Marlott at Jones Day brought to my attention a ruling from last fall pdf icon by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) concerning the use of the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (IAWM) for patent prior art in the context of an inter partes review. While this use of IAWM is well-established, the ruling suggests that IAWM may not unto itself be sufficient to qualify as a "printed publication" for the purposes of establishing dated patent disclosures.

Specifically, the PTAB judge noted that the demonstrated historical public accessibility of a given web document, as substantiated by IAWM, only established that it was technically accessible; it didn't go to its "public accessibility" — i.e., its discoverability by, dissemination to, and/or circulation within the relevant community of practice. Here is the critical excerpt from the ruling, First Solar, Inc. v. Rovshan Sade, IPR2023-00827, Paper 13 at 18 (PTAB Nov. 16, 2023) pdf icon:
"[T]he present case lacks any testimonial evidence that a person interested in solar trackers or solar panel assemblies would be independently aware of the web address for Wattsun or even of the company or its products. In other words, there was no evidence that the ordinarily skilled artisan would know of Wattsun or its web address. Nor does Petitioner offer evidence, or even argument, that Wattsun's webpage was 'indexed ... (through search engines or otherwise)' and thus locatable by a search engine."
While IAWM is no doubt essential to these kinds of investigations, it's not the only tool for web archaeology. Curious about this case specifically and the more general possibilities for discovering applicable historical web context for these kinds of cases, I decided to perform some additional exploration and document it here. For reference, the patent in question was filed on 6 July 2010.

This ended up being a long post. For convenience, I'm providing a table of contents below for folks interested in particular approaches. You can also jump ahead to the conclusion, for a summary of findings.

Key web addresses

Let's start by reviewing the key historical web resources.

The main prior art of interest was an installation guide for a commercial solar tracker product, with model name AZ-125. The copy referenced by the petitioner was an IAWM capture dated 2 December 2005 pdf icon from the website for the product family brand, Wattsun.

By extension, we might reasonably suppose that the contemporaneous discoverability of either the Wattsun home page or the AZ-125 product page, from which the installation guide was linked, would also be relevant.

Reviewing the 2 December 2005 capture of the Wattsun home page, it appears that Wattsun solar trackers were manufactured by a company called Array Technologies.

IAWM has few captures of the Array Technologies website prior to the patent filing date. A 15 February 2005 capture of the "About Us" webpage suggests that the domain belonged to another company at this time. A 7 August 2009 capture of the home page shows a parked domain, suggesting that the solar systems company didn't own the domain at this time, either.

Given that, let's proceed only with the three aforementioned web addresses:
Only the last of these still resolves, and the content of the webpage has, predictably, drifted significantly from 2005.

A Google search for "az-125" limited to the domain wattsun.com (i.e., using the site: operator) yields no results, suggesting that the web resources at the first two links were not just moved but are in fact now gone.
Backlink analysis is a search engine optimization (SEO) technique that looks at external links pointing to a website or webpage of interest. The number of backlinks as well as the relative popularity, authority, and/or subject relevance of the websites where they appear can be useful signals for the discoverability of the target website or webpage.

That two of the key historical web addresses are no longer active complicates this analysis, as any historical backlinks are more likely to have decayed over time (i.e., removed by their webmasters, having recognized that they were dead links).

Given the commercial importance of SEO, there are a number of backlink analyzers available. Through some experimentation, I've mostly settled on Ubersuggest as my preferred tool, since it (uniquely, that I've seen) provides the date on which its crawlers first observed a given backlink.

I ran all three of the key web addresses through the tool. Not entirely surprisingly, it didn't find any backlinks for either the AZ-125 installation guide or the AZ-125 product webpage. It did find over 1,500 backlinks for the Wattsun home page as of 8 March 2024, though none from prior to the patent filing date.

From IAWM, it's clear that www.wattsun.com was a live website at least as early as 25 January 1999, which makes the absence of observed backlinks prior to 6 July 2010 surprising. Suspicious of this result, I looked up and discovered that the founding date of Ubersuggest was 2012, so understandably it wouldn't have indexed backlinks prior to that date.

While this tool didn't work with these links for this threshold date, hopefully one can nonetheless see the conceptual potential. If Ubersuggest had been able to identify backlinks prior to the patent filing date, IAWM could then be employed to verify that they were in fact present on the indicated webpages at specific points in time.

Google date operators

Google's search results can obviously provide a contemporary view of the discoverability of specific webpages or websites for specific queries. Through the additional application of date operators, it is possible to also gain insight into historical search results.

Functionally, the date operators allow for the temporal filtering of returned search results. This sounds straight-forward, but there are some counter-intuitive aspects to how this works which I documented through experimentation in a previous, standalone blog post.

Google searches modified with date operators should be understood to provide only approximations of what search results would have historically been returned. There are at least three ways in which they are definitively unrepresentative:
  • They're over-inclusive of search results, because the keyword matching takes place against the most current indexed version of the webpage, not the historical one. That is to say, if the matching keywords weren't present on the historical version of a webpage, then it's less likely that it would've been included in the search results then even though it is now.
  • They're under-inclusive of search results, because some webpages that may have previously existed and been returned no longer exist and thus have been dropped from Google's search index.
  • How Google performs relevance matching and results ranking changes constantly, so any given search result may or may not have been included at all, or been more or less prominent historically than it is now. On the other hand, if we are to assume that Google strives and generally succeeds at maintaining the quality of its search results over time, a plausibly high-ranking search result may be a relatively stronger indicator of that it also ranked highly historically.
With that background, let's start with a Google search for "az-125" installation guide with a before: date of 6 July 2010 (i.e., the patent filing date).

There are a few promising results, from a search executed on 10 March 2024 (screenshot):
If a clear and credible date doesn't accompany the content, we can then look up these web addresses in IAWM to corroborate that the references to the Wattsun AZ-125 were present in the time frame of interest. For these results, their date of publication is not self-evident, so let's consult IAWM.

The earliest capture of the search result with title, "INSTALLATION GUIDE" pdf icon is 21 December 2023 pdf icon — unfortunately, well after the patent filing date. Sometimes examining the cached original last-modified HTTP header in IAWM can provide additional insight on the preceding time period in which the captured version of the webpage was likely available, but in this instance the header was missing.

Returning to the still-available live version pdf icon, it turns out that it reports a 16 March 2007 last-modified date, so there is a high likelihood that this version of the document has been continuously available at this web address since that time, notwithstanding the later IAWM capture.

We can then check the web address in Ubersuggest to possibly see where on the website (or externally) it had been linked from, but that turned up no results.

The earliest capture of the search result with title, "wattsun solar trackers: suggested retail price and ordering guide" pdf icon is 22 March 2006 pdf icon, which is prior to the patent filing date.

The earliest capture of the search result with title, "How Solar Cells Work" pdf icon is 16 October 2006 pdf icon, which is also prior to the patent filing date.

To get some sense of the extent to which either Wattsun or the AZ-125 show up organically for a set of date-limited results, let's next try a Google search for solar tracker with a before: date of 6 July 2010.

For me, executing the search on 1 March 2024, this returns about 111,000 results. A quick Find in page search for either "wattsun" or "az-125" turns up neither. If I scroll down and force the asynchronous load of a few more "pages" of search results, hits for both eventually show up.

Curious as to whether any Wattsun webpages show up in this entire search result set, I add the site: operator and constrain the search to the domain wattsun.com.

No results are returned. This is odd, as wattsun.com is currently a live domain and, as we already know from IAWM, the website also existed by 6 July 2010.

To review the dates that Google has recorded for the wattsun.com webpages that it has indexed, we can remove the keywords from the search and set the before: value to today's date (i.e., 1 March 2024).

Looking through the dates associated with the search results, the earliest date is 5 October 2013. Evidently, the website underwent a major change subsequent to 6 July 2010, such that Google has recorded no earlier change or publication dates for any of its webpages. We can actually observe this in IAWM, by comparing the two closest captures of www.wattsun.com before and after 5 October 2013.

Let's try another Google search, this time for wattsun solar tracker, again with a before: date of 6 July 2010. For me, executing the search on 3 March 2024, this returns about 45 results (screenshot).

If I scroll down and force the asynchronous load of all of the results, a quick Find in page returns no hits for "az-125". There are, however, a few hits for the Wattsun AZ-225 dual-axis solar tracker:
Once again, aside from what Google asserts, the dates of these search results are not self-evident. Let's again look up these web addresses in IAWM, to corroborate that the references to the Wattsun AZ-225 (or perhaps, even, the Wattsun AZ-125) were present in the time frame of interest.

The earliest capture of the search result with title, "Wattsun AZ-225 Solar Tracker for 12 Kyocera 200 Modules" is 7 August 2010 — close to but subsequent to the patent filing date. The last-modified HTTP header was absent for both the still-available live version and the IAWM capture.

Clicking on the "Trackers - Active" link in the breadcrumb navigation, then clicking the left temporal navigation arrow in the IAWM overlay banner brings up a capture of that webpage from 2 July 2010, a few days before the patent filing date. The webpage shows multiple configurations of the Wattsun AZ-125 solar tracker. For whatever it's worth, it also indicates configurations of the AZ-125 and AZ-225 as "Bestsellers" (perhaps for this category?).

There were no captures for the search result with title, "TRACKED VS FIXED: PV SYSTEM COST AND AC ..." pdf icon. I went ahead and added one using the IAWM Save Page Now feature. Other clues as to the date of this document's online availability point in varying directions:
This last finding, in particular, casts doubt on the document's online availability on the Google-recorded date of 8 February 2008. And none of the other temporal information otherwise definitively substantiates that it was available prior to the patent filing date.

Moving on, the earliest capture of the search result with title, "Helping You Control Alternative Energy! Woll Solar System" was 17 June 2012 — a couple of years later than the patent filing date. The x-archive-orig-last-modified date was only slightly earlier: 22 April 2012.

On previous Google data operator-amended searches, I had turned up a couple more results with references to Wattsun solar trackers:
There was exactly one capture for each of these search results: on 13 May 2005 for the one with title, "Active Trackers Items at ALTERNATIVE ENERGY STORE", and on 4 May 2010 for the one with title, "Active Trackers - DIY Solar Panels & Renewable Energy @ AltE Store".

On closer inspection, these seem to be the same section — "Active Trackers" — of the same company's (i.e., the Alternative Energy Store) website at different points in time. Unfortunately, there were no captures for either version of the website for the section labeled, "Wattsun Trackers", but it at least strongly suggests that this was a category of product that they offered in both 2005 and 2010.

In summary, the combined application of Google date operators and IAWM corroborate the availability of the following relevant content prior to the patent filing date:
  • A copy of the AZ-125 installation guide separately made available by a commercial provider and
  • Information about and marketing of Wattsun solar trackers, including the AZ-125, by at least four commercial providers.
Google by itself also attests to references to Wattsun solar trackers prior to the patent filing date by an additional commercial provider and a community initiative, though other evidence contradicts that for the latter.

These are all de facto discoverable through Google, though it's hard to say definitively when they were indexed.

YouTube date operators

YouTube conveniently supports the same date operators as Google search. This can be used to discover matching videos from a particular time frame.

Let's try a YouTube search for wattsun, with a before: date of 6 July 2010.

There are a handful of clearly related videos:
Contemporary view counts for these videos range from ~900 to ~76,000. More relevant to our purposes is the view count around the time of the patent filing, as a measure of their historical dissemination.

A couple of the higher-view count videos have older captures in IAWM. This allows us to check the view count at points in time closer to that of the patent filing:
  • The search result with title, Wattsun Solar Tracker (published on 8 June 2007) had ~73,000 views as of 5 January 2014. While this is more than three years after the patent filing date, we can observe that the video has only gained ~3,000 views in the last decade, suggesting that the views are heavily weighted towards the first seven years after its publication.
  • The search result with title, Wattsun solar tracker time lapse (published on 10 August 2008) had ~5,000 views as of 21 April 2012. While this is almost two years after the patent filing date, we can observe that the video has only gained ~2,000 views in the last dozen years, again suggesting that the views are heavily weighted towards the first four years after its publication.
In summary, through the combined application of YouTube date operators and IAWM, we have found seven videos published before the patent filing date, two of which plausibly had thousands of views by then. We also found another commercial provider working with Wattsun solar trackers.

Bing date filters

Like Google, Bing can also filter search results by date, providing additional insight into historical search results. While I haven't yet studied the mechanics of Bing's implementation in depth, it appears that results can be filtered both through web address parameters as well as the user interface. For this exploration, I'll use the latter.

Let's start with a Bing search for wattsun "az-125" limited to the time period from 1 January 2000 to 6 July 2010.

This returns one promising result:
The search result is not archived in IAWM.

Interestingly, the Images section of the search results highlights a few images having to do with Wattsun solar trackers, if not the AZ-125 specifically. However, clicking through to the Images interface, I no longer see the operative date filter parameter in the web address nor any visual cue that these search results are constrained to the same time period, so I won't examine these further.

Next let's try a search for solar tracker limited to the time period from 1 January 2000 to 6 July 2010.

A quick Find in page search for either "wattsun" or "az-125" turns up neither, for the first five pages of results.

Given that, let's modify the query slightly, to wattsun solar tracker limited to the time period from 1 January 2000 to 6 July 2010.

There are a few promising results:
Helpfully, the landing pages for all of these search results have obvious publication dates and those correspond to the Bing-recorded dates, so there's little need to independently consult IAWM.

In summary, through the application of Bing date operators, we have found the following relevant content available prior to the patent filing date:
  • Two consumer reviews of Wattsun solar trackers;
  • Another commercial solar energy systems provider working with Wattsun solar trackers, including the AZ-125;
  • Two (previously noted) videos about Wattsun solar trackers;
  • Two posts about Wattsun solar trackers on related forums;
  • A solar energy conference paper mentioning a Wattsun solar tracker; and
  • Two articles about companies setting up Wattsun solar trackers as part of larger solar energy equipment deployments.
These are all de facto discoverable through Bing, though it's hard to say definitively when they were indexed.

X date operators

X (née Twitter) also provides for date operator-enabled searches. This can be used to explore historical mentions of particular keywords on the platform.

Let's try an X search for solar tracker, with an until: date of 6 July 2010. If I scroll down and force the asynchronous load of all of the results, a quick Find in page returns one hit for "wattsun".

The shortened link resolves to a blog post dated 3 April 2010 titled "Wattsun Solar Tracker" featuring a YouTube video of the same. The website appears to belong to a container home consultant.

Looking up the X user's account in IAWM for a roughly contemporaneous time frame, we can see that they had 223 followers who would have had an opportunity to see the tweet.

As a follow up, let's try an X search for "wattsun", with the same until: date as before.

Some of the mentions appear to be from spam accounts, but others appear legitimate, e.g.,
In summary, through the combined application of X date operators and IAWM, we have found a conference at which a representative of the Wattsun manufacturer was on the program and another commercial provider working with Wattsun solar trackers.

Reddit threads

Reddit is a popular forum-based social network. As it is natively organized around communities interested in a particular topic, it can be used to observe whether a particular idea or product was being discussed at a particular point in time.

In this instance, let's try the r/solar Subreddit, as that's the most likely place we'll find relevant hits.

A search for "wattsun" returns three posts. The oldest of these is a decade old.

Clicking through to the thread, there are a couple of comments there regarding Wattsun solar trackers. The displayed datestamps are imprecise (e.g., "11y ago"), but we can either hover over them or inspect the source code to view the exact publication date.

Inspecting the source code, the timestamp of the original post is 2013-11-21T03:32:04.638Z and that of the last comment is 2013-11-22T06:28:55.137Z — too late with respect to the patent filing date, unfortunately.

Looking up the Subreddit in IAWM for the capture date closest to the patent filing date, we see that the group only had 30 readers (which I suppose means members?). However, by the time of the aforementioned post, the Subreddit was up to 3,604 readers.

Though the dates didn't work neatly in this instance, this approach is conceptually promising.

Conclusion

To summarize the cumulative findings through all approaches, I discovered and documented the following online references to Wattsun solar trackers prior to the patent filing date:
The publication dates of a few of these rely solely on Google's attestations, but many either self-attest or can be corroborated by antecedent captures in IAWM.

It's hard to say what threshold a PTAB judge might apply, but here there are clearly multiple and diverse traces suggesting that Wattsun products were known within the community of practice and commercially available prior to the patent filing date.

Circling back to the top, and an animating concern for this investigation, while the PTAB may increasingly regard isolated IAWM captures alone as insufficient to substantiate "public accessibility" going forward, IAWM remains an essential complement to almost all of the other techniques explored here. Without it, relevant context may be overlooked and the dates of content without self-evident timestamps can't be corroborated.

Given that, I would encourage patent litigators and prior art researchers to continue to consider how best to leverage IAWM's unique affordances, in combination with other methods.